> The bigger the datasets, the better results you have Wouldn't you agree that the ability to achieve relatively good results with relatively small datasets is

> The bigger the datasets, the better results you have Wouldn't you agree that the ability to achieve relatively good results with relatively small datasets is one of the main reasons for the current ML boom? > it's a trivial thing for AI to absorb huge amounts of information Of course, I agree on that. But I also note that "traditional" (non-ML) algorithms can digest big data too, so I don't see that ability as the defining characteristic of the current wave of ML-related technologies.