3 ms·
Eh, I'm not so sure he's endangering anything. He's only staking his personal reputation, that's what "I only speak for myself" means. If it comes out that the
by 3pt14159 10y ago
Eh, I'm not so sure he's endangering anything. He's only staking his personal reputation, that's what "I only speak for myself" means. If it comes out that the company does what he says he doesn't see them do, then hes only burning himself; not the company. Worst case scenario he gets fired and someone else will hire him. It isn't like he works for the NSA. Good software developers are hard to find and bleeding information serves a purpose.
- hendersoon 10y agoThat's true. The only way that he or his company could truly be hurt is if Silent Circle did get a NSL and he admitted to it publicly. If they got a NSL and he lied about it, no harm will come to him. Or if he's telling the truth, obviously.
- lazaroclapp 10y ago> The only way that he or his company could truly be hurt is if Silent Circle did get a NSL and he admitted to it publicly. At which point we are talking civil disobedience, so worrying about whether that will land them in trouble with management is missing the point by a mile and a half.
- JshWright 10y agoHe's not a US citizen, and does not reside in the United States, so the legal risks to him personally are comparatively small.