4 ms·

I fail to see where s/he said they were okay with the predecessors actions. You appear to be making a huge assumption. S/he said what she did was wrong and noth

by jrs235 10y ago

I fail to see where s/he said they were okay with the predecessors actions. You appear to be making a huge assumption. S/he said what she did was wrong and nothing about predecessors. I would make the assumption that s/he believes the predecessors were wrong too (assuming they did the exact same thing) and not assume that this has something to do with subject of this instance.

projectramo 10y ago
Yeah, I guess that's right. All the other responses to this thread are moving in the same direction. I was also inferring something from the statement. I don't see that anything was "hand waved" other than it stopped short of prosecution. So, to my ears, that is what he was espousing. I guess I would expect something specific: 1. Yes, prosecute the previous people as well! 2. Ah, I see. Well I don't believe all SoS since the invention of email should be prosecuted, so in order to be fair, I guess I don't believe she should be as well. 3. I don't believe it was as bad 4. I don't know? But that is why the question was asked.