4 ms·

There's no question she intended to use a personal email server to exchange classified information--that's the violation of law.

• angelbob 10y ago
  Right, but they need criminal or treasonous intent, or gross negligence. "Broke the law" isn't enough, in the same way that old jaywalking charges don't generally get brought up against you, even if somebody can prove it with security camera footage. The bar gets higher when you're digging up old stuff.
• snuxoll 10y ago
  Not only that, but there is mountains of evidence that she deleted emails that should have been turned over to the state. In the Judicial Watch case there's been plenty of emails attached to deposition's that weren't included in the public email release, so unless they simply "forgot" to release these emails or they were some of the few that were withheld due to containing "confidential" information then she deliberately worked to withhold these emails, who knows what else she considered "personal" and decided to not turn over to the State Department. "I'm the most transparent person I know how to be", well, just because frosted glass is semi-transparent doesn't mean it does a good job at it.