3 ms·

And it's not clear to me that fixing a broken system is worth the time, when we have a working system standing by idly. I don't know of anyone who is asking for

And it's not clear to me that fixing a broken system is worth the time, when we have a working system standing by idly. I don't know of anyone who is asking for more interactiveness for most of the web, but I do know that non-js works, and works well. It may not be as "interactive", but I view that as a good thing. Of course, this is all in context of a typical webpage. There are exceptions to this.

SquareWheel 10y ago
> I don't know of anyone who is asking for more interactiveness for most of the web Hi, that's me. The reason is, quite simply, because this is not a good user experience: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmaP3JvUcAA8-5a.jpg:large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmaP3JvUcAA8-5a.jpg:large The open web is my platform of choice, and the technology is finally there. Progressive Web Apps[1] offer the features of native but are instantly-available, without downloading or installing. So yes, I very much want that as a developer. https://developers.google.com/web/progressive-web-apps/ https://developers.google.com/web/progressive-web-apps/
- CaptSpify 10y ago
  I don't see how that image proves your point. Shitty designs are shitty if they are in a web-app, or mobile-app. OK, fine. I'll concede devs want more interactiveness. I have yet to see evidence that users want more interactiveness. I think that points to the arrogance of devs "who totally know better than the user".
  - SquareWheel 10y ago
    Users want positive experiences, and devs want to build those positive experiences. Look at some of the most popular websites out there: Youtube, Spotify, Amazon, Reddit - they're built on interaction. You're not just reading a post on reddit, you're upvoting it and influencing the front page. This had traditionally happened through POST/GET requests and having all the logic server-side. Yes it's possible to build interaction without Javascript, but it's not a great effect. Imagine if you had to wait for a page load every time you voted on a post on reddit. Now extend that to modern webapps. Take Google's Voice Memos demo[1]. It loads instantly. It supports any device. You can even add it to your homescreen and you won't be able to tell it from a native app. Everything about it just works. Why would a user not want such an experience? Javascript interaction is the natural evolution of the web. If it wasn't JS it would have been something else. This growth has been driven by users, devs, and browser vendors alike. There's nothing "arrogant" about it. [1] https://voice-memos.appspot.com/ https://voice-memos.appspot.com/
  - sanderjd 10y ago
    That's funny, I just replied to you arguing the opposite. People in tech are the only ones I ever hear complaining about rich web apps. YMMV I suppose!
sanderjd 10y ago
> I don't know of anyone who is asking for more interactiveness for most of the web I don't know of anyone, besides programmers, who doesn't like the current interactive-web-app web more than the decade-ago full-page-load web. They don't like ads and popups and things being slow either, but they love Gmail and AirBnB and Facebook and on and on. We should solve the problems without throwing away all the good stuff.

SquareWheel 10y ago

> I don't know of anyone who is asking for more interactiveness for most of the web Hi, that's me. The reason is, quite simply, because this is not a good user experience: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmaP3JvUcAA8-5a.jpg:large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmaP3JvUcAA8-5a.jpg:large The open web is my platform of choice, and the technology is finally there. Progressive Web Apps[1] offer the features of native but are instantly-available, without downloading or installing. So yes, I very much want that as a developer. https://developers.google.com/web/progressive-web-apps/ https://developers.google.com/web/progressive-web-apps/

CaptSpify 10y ago
I don't see how that image proves your point. Shitty designs are shitty if they are in a web-app, or mobile-app. OK, fine. I'll concede devs want more interactiveness. I have yet to see evidence that users want more interactiveness. I think that points to the arrogance of devs "who totally know better than the user".
- SquareWheel 10y ago
  Users want positive experiences, and devs want to build those positive experiences. Look at some of the most popular websites out there: Youtube, Spotify, Amazon, Reddit - they're built on interaction. You're not just reading a post on reddit, you're upvoting it and influencing the front page. This had traditionally happened through POST/GET requests and having all the logic server-side. Yes it's possible to build interaction without Javascript, but it's not a great effect. Imagine if you had to wait for a page load every time you voted on a post on reddit. Now extend that to modern webapps. Take Google's Voice Memos demo[1]. It loads instantly. It supports any device. You can even add it to your homescreen and you won't be able to tell it from a native app. Everything about it just works. Why would a user not want such an experience? Javascript interaction is the natural evolution of the web. If it wasn't JS it would have been something else. This growth has been driven by users, devs, and browser vendors alike. There's nothing "arrogant" about it. [1] https://voice-memos.appspot.com/ https://voice-memos.appspot.com/
- sanderjd 10y ago
  That's funny, I just replied to you arguing the opposite. People in tech are the only ones I ever hear complaining about rich web apps. YMMV I suppose!

sanderjd 10y ago

> I don't know of anyone who is asking for more interactiveness for most of the web I don't know of anyone, besides programmers, who doesn't like the current interactive-web-app web more than the decade-ago full-page-load web. They don't like ads and popups and things being slow either, but they love Gmail and AirBnB and Facebook and on and on. We should solve the problems without throwing away all the good stuff.