3 ms·
FWIW, typical raw fMRI data is mostly useless unless you know the design parameters of the study (stimulus timing, imaging onsets, etc.). Though there are some
by ihnorton 10y ago
FWIW, typical raw fMRI data is mostly useless unless you know the design parameters of the study (stimulus timing, imaging onsets, etc.). Though there are some interesting data-driven analyses techniques, especially for resting-state data.
Many research studies in the U.S. are required to do "structural" scans (high-resolution T1 or T2) and send them to a safety read by a radiologist, for liability reasons. At very least, this scan should be available directly from the hospital imaging department. If you are lucky all the data will have been sent through the hospital PACS and the imaging department will indiscriminately dump everything. At a research-only center it might be more complicated because such images are likely sent off-site for the safety read.
- bpchaps 10y agoRight, they did actually give me the surface scan. It was really, really cool, though with really low resolution. What got me interested in getting the data was this: [1]. It might be difficult to work with, but there was a lot of motivation to learn it. [1] http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/GaelVaroquaux/nilearn_course/blob/master/rendered_notebooks/1_Introduction.ipynb http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/GaelVaroquaux/nilearn_cou...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]