>fMRI hasn't been taken seriously I don't know where you got that (very strange) impression. The dead fish paper showed that multiple comparisons yield false

>fMRI hasn't been taken seriously I don't know where you got that (very strange) impression. The dead fish paper showed that multiple comparisons yield false positives, which is a problem that is much broader than fMRI methodology. With proper method, fMRI is a very reliable and insightful tool. It's just very difficult to do properly.