I don't see how that's really relevant. The point of the dead salmon paper was "do your damn FWE corrections". The point of paper, is rather "popular tools m

I don't see how that's really relevant. The point of the dead salmon paper was "do your damn FWE corrections". The point of paper, is rather "popular tools make unsound assumptions" (or, inversely, "researchers are violating the assumptions made by their tools"). The problem in the salmon paper is easy to fix. The problem in this paper is trickier.