3 ms·
> open-source Take a look at his licensing page. [1] Certainly isn't Open Source in the traditional sense and the terms are pretty convoluted; again IMO the re
by OzzyB 10y ago
> open-source
Take a look at his licensing page. [1] Certainly isn't Open Source in the traditional sense and the terms are pretty convoluted; again IMO the reason for it not gaining mainstream developer adoption.
I remember paying a yearly fee ($100?) for their "Club Greensock" membership so I could develop and supply code for clients and be in good standing. Of course the costs involved trying to replicate this toolkit and keep within deadlines made the fee seem very reasonable at the time.
> transition
There was definitely a transition, some Devs might argue it wasn't that painful; but certainly having a JS version of this particular codebase helped immensely, and also proved that we could still do all the "sizzle" we were able to do in Flash now with JS.
The posted example is testament to that IMO. Very smooth :)
[1] https://greensock.com/licensing/ https://greensock.com/licensing/