4 ms·
That article is very nice but you're not reading it correctly if your takeaway is that "1.1% of users would benefit more from a CSS menu than from a JS menu". G
by scrollaway 10y ago
That article is very nice but you're not reading it correctly if your takeaway is that "1.1% of users would benefit more from a CSS menu than from a JS menu". GDS is the UK government - a large portion of that 1.1% is likely not loading the CSS either. Bots, crawlers, rss readers, etc. The 0.2% number is much closer to what you're looking for.
And to repeat: Those that disable javascript have a choice in the matter. Accessibility isn't a matter of choice.
- tommorris 10y agoI didn't take that from it. See "I'm not endorsing making menus in CSS." I'm endorsing progressive enhancement. Those that disable JavaScript do have a choice in it, but those who don't have JavaScript because it has been disabled for them, or because they are using a device that doesn't support JavaScript, don't have a choice in the matter.