There are lots of things that cause harm, but they aren't what I am talking about and they are different topics. We don't have to be consistent for all types of

There are lots of things that cause harm, but they aren't what I am talking about and they are different topics. We don't have to be consistent for all types of harm. That's asinine. I'm not "retreating", I am clarifying why there is a difference between an industry whose products causes 20% of deaths and free people engaging in activities as you can't seem to tell the difference, but you are being deliberately obtuse. How can I be retreating by mentioning "unequal mortality"? That's the title of the article. You are just being silly. You are playing games by placing words in my mouth: "I guess that inequality is ok?". Straw man. You are saying that if one form of harm could be regulated or banned, all must be. Slippery slope. "What do you gain..." - again, focusing on me instead of addressing the topic. Ad hominem. I think you understand all of this but you are trolling. Intellectual dishonesty.