I thought Sawstop and such were only expensive because tool manufacturers weren't interested in producing them in bulk. (?) If so, the jury probably balked at

I thought Sawstop and such were only expensive because tool manufacturers weren't interested in producing them in bulk. (?) If so, the jury probably balked at the business rationale: "We don't want to spend $10 million on a saftey feature that will raise the price of our saws by $50, because nobody will buy them." It's still a bad precedent, but it makes more sense.