It's all about the finesse in how these issues are worded. She reduces complex issues to a bite sized, strong, yet inaccurate argument. By leaving out the nuanc

It's all about the finesse in how these issues are worded. She reduces complex issues to a bite sized, strong, yet inaccurate argument. By leaving out the nuance of such issues, we could end up with overreaching legislation that leaves the market less competitive than previously. A company can choose to sell their products through Apple's store front, however they have to play by Apple's rules. Target, Walmart, Amazon, etc all make products in their stores that compete with products from other vendors that sell items in their stores. If we change the rules because Apple is perceived to have an unfair advantage, should the other distributors change? And if so, what sustains the incentive to make services and products that could possibly compete on price and quality with other vendors.