2 ms·
I prefer to avoid jQuery for Greasemonkey, because the per-page performance hit of inserting it into the DOM / waiting to load from Google / running through var
by jmillikin 17y ago
I prefer to avoid jQuery for Greasemonkey, because the per-page performance hit of inserting it into the DOM / waiting to load from Google / running through various abstraction layers is IMO not worth reducing a 20-line script to 10 lines.
- andrewcooke 17y agook, thanks - i was curious about that (i suspect there must be some caching, that ameliorates the cost of loading if you use a site regularly, but i have no idea about the rest).