I'd agree that Rust doesn't manage to entirely avoid dynamic memory allocation unless you use unsafe code... but as you say, you can't use the safer parts of C+

I'd agree that Rust doesn't manage to entirely avoid dynamic memory allocation unless you use unsafe code... but as you say, you can't use the safer parts of C++ without running into the same issues. There's also a chance that you might be able to encapsulate your unsafe code behind safe abstractions, and Rust can help prove the rest is memory-safe.