2 ms·

We are talking about the same thing: those managed away from domestic power get compensated by a bxl holiday if their blackmail powers warrant it. The Parliame

by Create 10y ago

We are talking about the same thing: those managed away from domestic power get compensated by a bxl holiday if their blackmail powers warrant it. The Parliament was and still is weaker than the Commission and the Council, the latter two usually work in tandem anyway. (Actually, the swpat rejection by the EP wasn't about values, but rather an attempt to demonstrate capabilities, unseen before or after for that matter, see belgacom). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/07/nsa-gchq-surveillance-european-law-report https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/07/nsa-gchq-surve... What was the consequence for those behind? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/06/security-and-liberty-theresa-mays-surveillance-plans https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/06/security-and-l... In a democracy you need to be informed (see NHS campaign). That is incompatible with W. Lippmann's Society of the Spectacle, privacy and freedom of thought.

toyg 10y ago
The Parliament now has veto powers on almost all directives, as well as a (not practiced yet) right to send packing the entire Commission. It does not have executive powers, so it cannot "take action". To be fair, it does need additional powers to initiate legislative action rather than just blocking or shaping laws that Commission and Council introduce; but that's blocked by euroskeptics who think BXL already has too much power and proposals should be left to national governments. The reason EP and Commission/Council don't lock horns that often is that, when you get down to details, pretty much everyone agrees that European Directives are right in principle (i.e. harmonizing this or that) and it's just about hammering out details (which are often just guidelines anyway and are left to national parliaments to sort out) and trade a few horses. Swpat and copyright extension were among the very few subjects that were simply too controversial to pass, so MEPs put the hammer down - at a time when their hammer was much smaller than it is now. As the EP gets a bigger role, it's on the electorate to send better-prepared MEPs. After 2009 old practices should be on their way out, as long as we push for this change to continue.

by Create 10y ago

toyg 10y ago

The Parliament now has veto powers on almost all directives, as well as a (not practiced yet) right to send packing the entire Commission. It does not have executive powers, so it cannot "take action". To be fair, it does need additional powers to initiate legislative action rather than just blocking or shaping laws that Commission and Council introduce; but that's blocked by euroskeptics who think BXL already has too much power and proposals should be left to national governments. The reason EP and Commission/Council don't lock horns that often is that, when you get down to details, pretty much everyone agrees that European Directives are right in principle (i.e. harmonizing this or that) and it's just about hammering out details (which are often just guidelines anyway and are left to national parliaments to sort out) and trade a few horses. Swpat and copyright extension were among the very few subjects that were simply too controversial to pass, so MEPs put the hammer down - at a time when their hammer was much smaller than it is now. As the EP gets a bigger role, it's on the electorate to send better-prepared MEPs. After 2009 old practices should be on their way out, as long as we push for this change to continue.