4 ms·
In the paper coining the term 'Singularity'[1], Verner Vinge describes that one way superintelligence could emerge is that large computer networks may "wake up"
by amasad 10y ago
In the paper coining the term 'Singularity'[1], Verner Vinge describes that one way superintelligence could emerge is that large computer networks may "wake up" as a "superhumanly intelligent entity".
I personally find any argument that relies on our lack of understanding of complex systems and emergence to be on shaky grounds at best and a fallacy at worst.
[1]: https://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/misc/singularity.html https://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/misc/singularity.ht...
- TeMPOraL 10y agoAn important thing about intelligence is that it doesn't have to be like the one we have. An intelligence that "wake up" won't say "hello" to us. Assuming we survive its birth, we may just recognize it as things slipping more and more out of anyone's control, ignoring our inputs and doing whatever. One could wonder if it didn't already happen with the economy. In a way, talking about these kinds of "meta-intelligences" is kind of a point-of-view thing. It depends on the abstraction level you use. You can look at an ant and think about it as an individual insect, or realize that it's just a tiny, specialized cog in an intricate machinery of a colony - a colony that kind of behaves like an individual animal. Similarly, at what point our day-to-day interactions with other people, aggregated over the entire population of the planet, start to resemble a planet-sized organism doing weird self-regulation stuff? What's the difference between saying that "the market decided" and saying that a low-level decision was made in a part of the planet's brain? Abstractions are weird this way.