4 ms·
>> "claims are unsupported and unscientific, and they demonstrate the danger of wild assertions made by non-experts reaching and misleading the masses." Maybe
by nxzero 10y ago
>> "claims are unsupported and unscientific, and they demonstrate the danger of wild assertions made by non-experts reaching and misleading the masses."
Maybe I missed it, but if it's so obvious that it's not unusual, then why're the "experts" unable to use science/data to prove it in the article.
Realize this isn't a popular opinion, but "peer review" is not science.
- gus_massa 10y agoI'll copy a comment by doener in a previous related article: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12012612 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12012612 > Ok, seems like this isn't really unprecedented: > 2015: https://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/06/24/1700Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/equirectan https://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/06/24/1700Z/wind/isobaric... . > 2014: https://earth.nullschool.net/#2014/10/14/1500Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa https://earth.nullschool.net/#2014/10/14/1500Z/wind/isobaric... .