4 ms·
> If it potentially affects user’s privacy anything but a scary looking big brother eye would be inappropriate. Well, what permissions don't?
by robryk 10y ago
> If it potentially affects user’s privacy anything but a scary looking big brother eye would be inappropriate.
Well, what permissions don't?
- deno 10y agoI meant anything that let’s the extension leak any data. Contacting 3rd-party servers, modifying DOM etc. I suppose more granular permissions might be required here.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- duskwuff 10y agoA few examples. (I'm not sure why a lot of these are treated as permissions at all.) * Running in the background * Displaying desktop notifications * Using the OS's text-to-speech engine * Storing more than 5MB of data in local storage