2 ms·
Note the may part of my answer. Also note the answer that points out underhanded ways to leak data. You then go ahead to recommend just the thing that gp was
by reitanqild 10y ago
Note the may part of my answer.
Also note the answer that points out underhanded ways to leak data.
You then go ahead to recommend just the thing that gp was making fun of: printing and physically altering the document instead of using a software tool.
Basically violent agreement: )
- Godel_unicode 10y agoYou should re-read my post. I said that there were standards for digital redaction which are considered sufficient and equivalent to physical redaction. Break. If you still want to manually redact... iow, manual redaction is a waste of time, but if you have time to waste here's an effective way to waste it. May is a pretty clear clue that the security "advice" which follows is fud. Your house may flood even if it's on top of a high hill, buy my insurance product.