> However let's say the figure is 50%. It's not. > Does the argument still follow? Yes. Given two people with similar academic achievements and no history

> However let's say the figure is 50%. It's not. > Does the argument still follow? Yes. Given two people with similar academic achievements and no history of violence, discriminating between them is ridiculous. Treating individuals different based solely on their skin colour would still have no scientific or logical basis, as you'll still have many many stupid and violent green skinners, and peaceful and intelligent blue skinners. All that the "studies" will do is discourage natural bigots from looking at the traits of an individual. > At what % would we inevitably be forced to pay > attention? At the point where you could reliably extrapolate about a given individual based on their skin colour more accurately than you could based on their personal history to date.