4 ms·
You seem to have read enough FT to reach that conclusion. In my case, since FT didn't let me read enough articles free, I didn't realise its value (assuming it
by kartickv 10y ago
You seem to have read enough FT to reach that conclusion. In my case, since FT didn't let me read enough articles free, I didn't realise its value (assuming it is valuable), so I don't pay for it. Catch-22.
The Economist and NYT, by contrast, have loose enough paywalls that I've read enough articles to conclude that they are both high-quality sources.
- cwilkes 10y agoAnd do you pay for either of those?
- kartickv 10y agoI used to subscribe to The Economist, yes. I discontinued because of missing issues, atrocious support, like not taking my calls, etc. In general, I don't mind paying for high-quality content. In fact, this morning I did a Google search for "donate to BBC" but nothing came up.