3 ms·
It's concerning to me that they can be charged out of concern for identity fraud and not actual identity fraud. I'm not a lawyer in any manner but how is that
by richman777 10y ago
It's concerning to me that they can be charged out of concern for identity fraud and not actual identity fraud.
I'm not a lawyer in any manner but how is that not prior restraint?
- ledude 10y agothings like this typically fall into either attempt crimes or conspiracy crimes.. wiki has a good explanation of both concepts... links below. in this particular case, there's an identity theft charge for submitting the invalid subpoena to the bank with the judge's information and an attempted identity theft charge for trying (and not succeeding) to access the judge's banking information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal)
- r00fus 10y agoHow else are they going to prove they don't owe the $16k charged for lawyer fees? Sounds like a $16k "don't poke around where you're not wanted" punitive charge. The $1.6M lawsuit was pretty offensive, also. None of this smells good.