3 ms·
I didn't malign others, either, as I didn't call anyone a moron... Yes, it's true I implied that you might think that others who puzzled over P vs. NP were moro
by Chinjut 10y ago
I didn't malign others, either, as I didn't call anyone a moron... Yes, it's true I implied that you might think that others who puzzled over P vs. NP were morons. I was, after all, laboring under the belief that you thought P vs. NP was trivial. Is that a malignment?
Anyway. Nevermind that. Feynman joked that P was trivially not equal to NP? Where can I find that joke given by Feynman?
- jsprogrammer 10y ago>Where can I find that joke given by Feynman? Approximately 6 parents up this comment tree. I'll address your other comment here (HN has an inexplicably bad rate limit): The physical model is the literal characters: P != NP :)
- Chinjut 10y agoI mean a cite that Feynman made that joke; where can I find that?
- bashinator 10y agoThis whole talk is about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3pYRn5j7oI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3pYRn5j7oI
- jsprogrammer 10y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12019310 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12019310 I wouldn't consider it authoritative though.