4 ms·
No, that was a side note about a bug that caused a ~10% increase in false positives. The real primary issue is that the clustering methods assume Gaussian autoc
by zbjornson 10y ago
No, that was a side note about a bug that caused a ~10% increase in false positives. The real primary issue is that the clustering methods assume Gaussian autocorrelation distributions, which don't exist in reality. They estimated a 70% false-positive rate because of this
http://m.pnas.org/content/early/2016/06/27/1602413113 http://m.pnas.org/content/early/2016/06/27/1602413113