I guess I meant the former in terms of it simply being the worker's job to get the review taken down. No actual threat of being fired at all, but the company ha

I guess I meant the former in terms of it simply being the worker's job to get the review taken down. No actual threat of being fired at all, but the company has given their implicit (or worse, explicit) 'ok' for using that threat as a manipulation tactic. Both are forms of moral bankruptcy, I was just curious whether the seemingly-desperate employee was a victim or a player.