3 ms·
The 30% doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that Apple prevents you from passing that cost on to your customers. You're not allowed to have your regular price
by erikpukinskis 10y ago
The 30% doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that Apple prevents you from passing that cost on to your customers. You're not allowed to have your regular price be X and your Apple price be X+30%. That's what's anticompetitive to me.
Apple is saying "we're providing a value-add, pay us" but not allowing developers to price it in to their balance sheet.
- coderdude 10y agoThey do that to prevent this scenario: You use them to advertise your site where customers can get a discount if you bail from the app store and buy from you directly. So many developers would try that oh so clever trick that they already know better in advance. Unless you're one of the anomalies who actually does a better job at driving traffic to your apps than they can, it makes no sense to complain about this.
- dreaminvm 10y agoThis is a common occurrence with Groupon. If you call the shop and mention using Groupon, most of the time they ask you not to purchase the Groupon. They still honor the discount, but avoid a 50% take by Groupon.
- st3v3r 10y ago"The 30% doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that Apple prevents you from passing that cost on to your customers. You're not allowed to have your regular price be X and your Apple price be X+30%. That's what's anticompetitive to me." That's not true at all. In fact, Spotify did have IAP in the app, and they charged an extra $3 for it.
- rdsnsca 10y agoSpotify cost $12.99 as an IAP on iOS so yes Apple DOES allow you to pass it of stop spreading FUD.