3 ms·
True, I was only citing the figure for memory access times on x86 (according to a quick google). There's certainly going to be more overhead depending on how th
by andrewstuart2 10y ago
True, I was only citing the figure for memory access times on x86 (according to a quick google). There's certainly going to be more overhead depending on how the cache is implemented, whether it's in memory, or swapped out/deliberately on disk, etc.
That said, I'd call it a fundamental architecture requirement (and one you can't really avoid anyway), given fundamental limitations imposed by the speed of light.