3 ms·

Im not following your reasoning. Which I admit has more to do with my lack of knowledge than anything else, so don't read that as "I think you are wrong". I did

by splawn 10y ago

Im not following your reasoning. Which I admit has more to do with my lack of knowledge than anything else, so don't read that as "I think you are wrong". I did find other places with the question asked... some have similar answers to the what-if... others came to a different conclusion as you did. Either way even if it is on some boundary of what is possible, it seems weird for this company to mention it as a feature considering it would be many many times less effective than using it with sunlight and even then only on a few nights out of the month if that.. EDIT: After giving TFA another look, I see that they do mention using PV and not just steam engines... so I guess you could use moonlight sometimes to charge a PV, then switch it to the steam engine during the day or something.

FiatLuxDave 10y ago
Another way that you could look at it, is as LeifCarrotson said below, that the moon is like a mirror. If RM's idea that the sun's light reflected from the moon could not start a fire was true, what makes the situation different if you are reflecting the sun's light from a cold mirror? Can the light from the mirror not cause a higher temperature than the temperature of the mirror? We know that mirrors (and even lenses made of ice) can be used to create temperatures at their focus high enough to melt them. So, what is it about the moon that is different from a mirror, besides a lower reflectivity? I suspect that RM just got a little lost in the weeds on this one. I remember making a similar mistake in undergrad when I was thinking about a problem with two light sources with an optical filter in between. The key insight I needed to make was that the filter was a physical object with its own temperature. Thinking about things like this is how you develop what physicists call "physical intuition".

by splawn 10y ago

FiatLuxDave 10y ago

Another way that you could look at it, is as LeifCarrotson said below, that the moon is like a mirror. If RM's idea that the sun's light reflected from the moon could not start a fire was true, what makes the situation different if you are reflecting the sun's light from a cold mirror? Can the light from the mirror not cause a higher temperature than the temperature of the mirror? We know that mirrors (and even lenses made of ice) can be used to create temperatures at their focus high enough to melt them. So, what is it about the moon that is different from a mirror, besides a lower reflectivity? I suspect that RM just got a little lost in the weeds on this one. I remember making a similar mistake in undergrad when I was thinking about a problem with two light sources with an optical filter in between. The key insight I needed to make was that the filter was a physical object with its own temperature. Thinking about things like this is how you develop what physicists call "physical intuition".