3 ms·
Beautiful art, but it's inconceivable that this would be cost effective per unit area if it's only increasing panel efficiency by 35% That's roughly 500Kg of w
by etrautmann 10y ago
Beautiful art, but it's inconceivable that this would be cost effective per unit area if it's only increasing panel efficiency by 35%
That's roughly 500Kg of water, in a glass sphere, and the whole thing would have to cost a couple hundred dollars to beat standard PV, an it STILL needs an active tracking system.