5 ms·
Definitely not since we've learned that (some) webpages send each keystroke while on the login page.
by cm3 10y ago
Definitely not since we've learned that (some) webpages send each keystroke while on the login page.
- techthroway443 10y agoWhat is this referring to?
- 27182818284 10y agoI believe this is referring to the ebay password submission that was on the front-page yesterday. The summary was that Ebay seemed to be sending each typed character of the password field back home.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- sp332 10y agoAt least eBay https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12000820 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12000820 and Twitter https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12002103 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12002103
- unfathomable 10y ago> Facebook wants to know why you didn’t publish that status update you started writing. > Unfortunately, the code in your browser that powers Facebook still knows what you typed—even if you decide not to publish it.* It turns out that the things you explicitly choose not to share aren't entirely private. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/12/facebook_self_censorship_what_happens_to_the_posts_you_don_t_publish.html http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/1...
- cm3 10y agoReminds me of the Petraeus scandal where they communicated via unsent Gmail drafts in a shared account. EDIT: From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petraeus_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petraeus_scandal Petraeus and Broadwell used fake names to create free webmail accounts exchanging messages without encryption tools. They would share an email account, with one saving a message in the drafts folder and the other deleting it after reading it.
- techthroway443 10y agoBrilliant
- scholia 10y agoWasn't that story thoroughly debunked? The data flows didn't support it, and Facebook denied it.