> Serial was really after a nugget of definitive evidence against Adnan -- for someone to come in and say, "I SAW this and that, and Anand is guilty." No. I di

> Serial was really after a nugget of definitive evidence against Adnan -- for someone to come in and say, "I SAW this and that, and Anand is guilty." No. I didn't get that sense at all. I think Sarah Koening tried to present this story in an objective and fair way. There is no way she set out to prove Adnan was guilty - for one thing, he was already in prison serving a life sentence and had one of his appeals denied. >I am a bit offended that you couldn't at least give me that benefit of the doubt before jumping to such conclusions. You use inflammatory language and argue in support of controversial points - it's tough to figure out exactly what you're talking about, much less give you some benefit of the doubt.