4 ms·
Well more like Dreamweaver is so far behind that it's trying to at least catch up a little to stay in the rearview mirror. Developers with a any design backgrou
by heavymark 10y ago
Well more like Dreamweaver is so far behind that it's trying to at least catch up a little to stay in the rearview mirror. Developers with a any design background probably started with Frontpage, then Dreamweaver then maybe Coda, and if they code for a living they most likely went to TextMate, then went to Sublime and now everyone is moving to Atom. (of course devs who don't like Guis use VIM or other alternatives).
On paper, a lot of the features Dreamweaver is adding like css code peak is nice, but something that Atom and others can simply add as a plugin if users want it. Dreamweaver is bloatware and won't be gaining much of any modern Atom users, but rather a good solution for people who don't know how to code well but their job require them to interact with code so having a heavy GUI like DW can help them get by.
At least Adobe is trying!
- partiallypro 10y agoI just use the code view in Dreamweaver quite often, not because I don't like Atom or VS Code, but because neither of them are good with S/FTP. A lot people still use Coda for this fact too. I still use VS Code when I get a chance. Not every project needs a repo, or a local environment. It may not be best practice, but some clients will force your hand into "cowboy coding."
- basch 10y agoI am a little surprised they havent acquired webflow, like they did aviary. I would think adobe's niche would be a more indesign like interface not a text editor.