3 ms·
>It's important to note this is not just controversial content, it's outright libel claiming false official sponsorship from real organizations. Are you a lawy
by timmytokyo 10y ago
>It's important to note this is not just controversial content, it's outright libel claiming false official sponsorship from real organizations.
Are you a lawyer?
- dnm 10y agoI think this kind of gets to the nut of the whole discussion here on HN. Everyone's talking about whether or not what the Yes Men did was legal, but IMO, the question is why did DO take them down over a legal threat ("...the NRA sent a legal complaint...")? The vice article was pretty ambiguous, but if this was a suit or court order, CloudFlare wouldn't be able to "pass." This apparently wasn't a court order, nor was it a DCMA takedown (or Vice's writing is just really bad). And it looks like youtube told them to come back with a court order.