3 ms·
>Your argument essentially invalidates that and supports a world where legal corruption is moral. No it doesn't. It implies that the correct fix is to eliminat
by hueving 10y ago
>Your argument essentially invalidates that and supports a world where legal corruption is moral.
No it doesn't. It implies that the correct fix is to eliminate tax loopholes, not attempting to guilt a corporation into paying more, which is about as effective as guilting the sun into cooling down.
- andrewprock 10y agoWell, now your arguing "that companies should pay what amount to optional taxes" by closing tax loopholes.
- zardeh 10y agoThey're no longer optional at that point.