3 ms·
Naming things makes them easier to distinguish, see the Wharfian Hypothesis [1] (which has been validated experimentally). For example, if you don't have diffe
by theptip 10y ago
Naming things makes them easier to distinguish, see the Wharfian Hypothesis [1] (which has been validated experimentally).
For example, if you don't have different words for blue and green (which is the case for some languages), then it's harder (slower) to distinguish distinct color samples that are blue and green than if you had words for the different colors.
If you're an Inuit, and you have words for different kinds of snow, it's going to be easier to disambiguate them, as you have a mental anchor (the name) for each concept.
In programming terms, I think there's a meaningful analogy with heap vs. dictionary lookups, with words allowing more efficient retrieval of unrelated concepts.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity
- argonaut 10y agoLinguistic relativity is quite controversial and nowhere near as clear cut as you are making it out to be - there are studies that don't support the claims around color naming, for example. When I last spoke to someone who studied linguistics (but wasn't a researcher), he said the consensus was there was only a weak effect.