3 ms·
1.5 MB, even if one-time only (assuming no cache-cleaning on client side), is quite heavy. Too heavy for vast majority of web applications.
by silversmith 17y ago
1.5 MB, even if one-time only (assuming no cache-cleaning on client side), is quite heavy. Too heavy for vast majority of web applications.
- ableal 17y agoWould you believe that some sites routinely dump 2MB on you, just for one page ? E.g., for AlleyInsider, which occasionally shows up here: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/100318_6303/ http://www.webpagetest.org/result/100318_6303/ (Nice tester from AOL - try your own cases)
- adamc 17y agoDepends on your audience. For a lot of in-house applications, that wouldn't be much of a problem. But if you are trying to build a new social media web site, it might well be.
- rcoder 17y agoI mostly agree with you, but, just to play devil's advocate... How exactly would you propose cramming a usable Python runtime into a download that was substantially less than 1.5 MB in size? On the OS X 10.5 box I'm sitting at right now, the 'libpython2.6.a' static library from my source build of Python 2.6 is over 6 MB. The actual 'python' binary is nearly 2 MB, and stripped of all debugging symbols, still comes in at about 1.4 MB. If you had some really good compression, and included only a small part of the standard library, I can see getting a CPython package in around the 2-3 MB mark, but not much more.