4 ms·

Hashcat v3.00 released

• yeasayer 10y ago
  Why there is no homebrew formula for hashcat? Developer claims OS X support. Feels weird to download binaries and check sums manually.
  • t3nary 10y ago
    This belongs to homebrew cask (https://caskroom.github.io/ https://caskroom.github.io/) and you can indeed install it using cask.
    • yeasayer 10y ago
      Isn't cask supposed to be for heavy apps with GUI?
      • Ambroos 10y ago
        I think you probably need some pretty big libraries installed to compile it yourself. Using cask you don't have to.
  • cclements 10y ago
    I know it wasn't what you were asking, but compiling on osx was fairly easy for me: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/master/BUILD.md#building-hashcat-for-linux-and-osx https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/master/BUILD.md#buil...
• deathy 10y ago
  Nice speedup. On my GTX 980Ti, WPA/WPA2 benchmark (-b -m 2500): cudaHashcat-2.01: 281.1 kH/s, hashcat-3.00: 301.2 kH/s
• executesorder66 10y ago
  They said they merged hashcat and oclhashcat. Sorry for the noob question, but is there any reason why they didn't also merge it with cudahashcat?
  • ac29 10y ago
    They did, which unfortunately means reduced performance for older (pre-Maxwell) NVIDIA cards.
• slizard 10y ago
  What about benchmarks and performance updates/regression/etc.? I'm sure the CUDA to OCL switch was a preformance hit at least in some cases (and compared to the equivalent CUDA code). Has anybody worked on something comprehensive? Would be good to convince he Phoronix guy to add it to his standard set of OpenCL benchmarks. He has the hardware and a good benchmarking/reporting tool, but somebody will need to pester him to do the benchmarks right.