3 ms·
That paper has little, if anything, to do with aphextron's point. It's a study of brain anatomy. Here's some directly-relevant literature, which points to a s
by omginternets 10y ago
That paper has little, if anything, to do with aphextron's point. It's a study of brain anatomy.
Here's some directly-relevant literature, which points to a systematic preference for occupations in men vs women: [0]
[0] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38061313_Men_and_Things_Women_and_People_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Sex_Differences_in_Interests https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38061313_Men_and_Th...
- bduerst 10y agoHence saying it was largely debunked from a biological perspective. aphextron didn't elaborate on the source of the psychological differences. I was pointing out that it wasn't biological and most likely cultural.
- omginternets 10y agoAnd that's completely irrelevant to the current discussion. BTW it's not even debunked from the biological perspective. It's debunked from a brain anatomy perspective.