Amazing how the author believes they have proved that there is 'no systematic bias' with This One Simple Trick! Edit: sorry for the tone, but I just find this

Amazing how the author believes they have proved that there is 'no systematic bias' with This One Simple Trick! Edit: sorry for the tone, but I just find this whole article bait. The headline is bait. The writer acknowledges the limitations of their study (basically that it doesn't prove much) but then makes a whole bunch of extrapolations anyway, and makes those guesses the meat of the article rather than investigating why their methods didn't work or how they could be improved or what would be required to produce conclusive evidence.