3 ms·
*before. I seem to be highly susceptible to spelling issues and one word omissions while sleep deprived. PG, if you're reading this, consider allowing very sma
by DaniFong 19y ago
*before.
I seem to be highly susceptible to spelling issues and one word omissions while sleep deprived. PG, if you're reading this, consider allowing very small (~one word) edits after posts have persisted.
- ken 19y agoIf only there was an easy way to submit Feature Requests for this website! (Yeah, I'm a jerk.)
- pg 19y agoWhat would the UI for that look like, though? Let people do arbitrary edits, and reject them if they changed too much? That would make people mad.
- hassy 19y ago* Allow unlimited editing within X minutes after posting. (Many forums do it this way.) * Keep history of all edits (as diffs of course). This would be very much in spirit of the board. :)
- DaniFong 19y agoIt's only a hunch, but perhaps after a certain point in time, you could change 'edit' to correct. Upon clicking correct, each word or space (to insert a word or two) becomes hyperlinkable, and if you click on it, you can do inline edits. Validate the changes in javascript, apply when a button is pressed, or focus is lost.