>I think the real point here is that there are more secure solutions. Saying that it's not all that less secure isn't a great argument. I'd say it's a very goo

>I think the real point here is that there are more secure solutions. Saying that it's not all that less secure isn't a great argument. I'd say it's a very good argument, this appears to be a non-issue that doesn't justify the dev time spent on "fixing" it. We don't live in a world with infinite dev resources. Edit: Since someone appears to disagree, how would you exploit this "bug"?