3 ms·
At 10x the price for S3.
by merpnderp 10y ago
At 10x the price for S3.
- acdha 10y agoThat's not a valid comparison for many applications: if you need POSIX filesystem semantics, it doesn't matter how much S3 costs because it cannot do the job, any more than you'd say S3 costs more than a USB key.
- KaiserPro 10y agoYou are correct. However its not for the same things. S3 is high latency, HTTP semantics, no locking mechanism. EFS is low latency, high throughput shared file system with standard posix interface. everything can write to standard files. Not many things can write using S3 effectively.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]