4 ms·
I'm having difficulties understanding this. If Google receives a request to remove content from some specific country, I would assume they are doing this based
by pfg 10y ago
I'm having difficulties understanding this. If Google receives a request to remove content from some specific country, I would assume they are doing this based on Geo-IP rather than based on the domain users enter. It wouldn't really make sense otherwise, as the link to the blocked content would not necessarily need to use the localized domain, so this would be ineffective. It seems like an unimportant implementation detail - one that seems to do more harm than good.
- lmm 10y agoIt means countries that want to block certain content can block all the other blogspot.* domains. i.e. blogspot.us is a site that they promise will only ever contain content that's legal in the US, so any country-level firewall in the US should leave that site unblocked, and so on.
- pfg 10y agoThat still seems like an odd trade-off. The same logic should apply to things like YouTube and Google+, but they don't have a ccTLD redirect for those sites.
- lmm 10y agoBlogspot is older (and/or maybe put more thought into it early on - a blogging platform is naturally a speech medium whereas YouTube may not have thought of itself in the same terms), country-level firewalls are a lot more sophisticated these days.