3 ms·
I didn't read the article, but based on the title alone: It could just as easily be the other way around: taxing humans to do what ought to be a robot's job. Th
by kseistrup 10y ago
I didn't read the article, but based on the title alone: It could just as easily be the other way around: taxing humans to do what ought to be a robot's job. There are so many shitty jobs in the world that robots should be doing instead, thus freeing two important human resources — emotions and creativity — for better use.