3 ms·
I remember running a BBS and being surprised at the 20 or so users I had from Germany. When I caught one of them online I asked how they could afford the bill
by mdip 10y ago
I remember running a BBS and being surprised at the 20 or so users I had from Germany. When I caught one of them online I asked how they could afford the bill and was told he had hacked a PBX and was connected, somehow, through that. I hadn't heard of that trick back then (and don't know the specifics of it now).
Long Distance was a horrible thing. In 1997, I was working for a CLEC/long distance provider that existed as a result of the 1996 "deregulation[0]". Times were great for about two years.
The price for long distance was never perfect against cost, but when everything went flat rate/minute and that rate continued to drop (ultimately becoming flat rate, period), I remember sitting in an employee meeting hosted by the CEO of Frontier (pre-Global Crossing/Frontier and later Citizens/Frontier). He had a graph on the screen showing the cost of a minute of long distance and the price we could charge for it. The lines were converging and I asked the fateful question "what happens when they cross"? To which I received a political deflection[1]. The best part was all of the industry rags were, at the time, screaming that there will always be a long distance surcharge since there will always be call termination per-minute rates. I could see it was only a matter of time before those fellas were proven wrong. Younger folks, today, don't have any concept of domestic long-distance rates, but AFAIK (and I've been out of telecom for a little while now) call termination still has a per-minute cost.
[0] In quotes because it wasn't so much a deregulation as it was changed regulation. The goal was to get local carriers to start competing with one another and long distance carriers. I believe the local carrier had to have a CLEC in their service area in order to provide their own long distance service. The hope was more competition with similar kinds of services. The result was a bunch of CLECs that figured out the law opened up some interesting opportunities. I remember a friend of mine setting up an ISP for the cost of equipment. He'd received his local phone numbers from a CLEC that would hand out locals that would cover a huge geographical area at practically no cost. What I didn't understand, then, was because call termination is the "cost" incurred by the LEC, inbound calls were pure profit. ISP lines were all inbound so the CLEC made buckets of money in pennies/minute from Ameritech/AT&T for the hours that his customers spent online.
[1] The days after the 1996 telco bill were interesting. Competition opened up and a whole new set of operators started up doing things like offering lines to ISPs (most people were dial-up back then) practically for free since all of the calls would be inbound and result in a huge paycheck from Ameritech/AT&T or whomever was the major established local carrier.
- mdip 10y agoApologies - that second bullet point was supposed to be: [1] The deflection was because his solution was to sell the company to Global Crossing -- at the time, a dot-com darling publicly traded on NASDAQ that lost heaping amounts of money. There really was no choice. Frontier was doomed because of the costs of its new SONET network and Global Crossing was offering way too much money so that passing up the deal would guarantee a shareholder lawsuit.