3 ms·
This idea of her's scares me. There is mathematically no way to allow the government access to encrypted documents without potentially allowing bad actors acces
by throwaway2016a 10y ago
This idea of her's scares me. There is mathematically no way to allow the government access to encrypted documents without potentially allowing bad actors access to them. It's math, you can't just change math because you will it.
And even if you could somehow get encryption that maintains security and allows government investigation, there is no stoping people from just using software written outside the law.
And that is assuming that you don't consider the government itself or any person who works for it as a potential bad actor.
That whole idea is all sorts of bad. It makes law abiding citizens less safe while doing almost nothing for our security.
- dllthomas 10y agoThis depends greatly on the form it takes. I am not optimistic, but if it is "pour tremendous resources into cryptanalysis research, honestly advising people to move away from algorithms as we find weaknesses and eventually publishing them", that could be a good thing. If anyone can break an algorithm, it's possibly best if it's the US govt first. If it involves trying to get people to use compromised systems, that won't work out well.