That's a good point, and the .6 is an optimistic score (I think it was from running a subset of their model) I got the sense that the authors felt that this pr

That's a good point, and the .6 is an optimistic score (I think it was from running a subset of their model) I got the sense that the authors felt that this proves an attack of this sort was possible and viable, but that their model wasn't quite there yet. OTOH this should be enough to acknowledge that the voice encryption/compression scheme they are attacking is not secure.