4 ms·
>They just have completely different goals. Not really. Teachers have every reason to fight for their life to be better too. If what you say of the UK teacher'
by undersuit 10y ago
>They just have completely different goals.
Not really. Teachers have every reason to fight for their life to be better too. If what you say of the UK teacher's union is true, maybe we should find out why the teachers, good and bad, are so intent on having a well paying secure job.
>requiring 4-year veterinary degree to do dog massage
No, that is not the rule, that is a exaggerated simplification.
- smsm42 10y ago> Teachers have every reason to fight for their life to be better too. I Oh yes, they have. But one shouldn't be confused that their interests are in any way aligned with the interests of the students in getting better (and cheaper) education. It's not an omission, it's by design. And it's not the only example - there are hundreds, if not thousands, regulations and setups that do not help the last those they are supposedly designed to help, and instead help politicians, interest groups and cronies. > No, that is not the rule, that is a exaggerated simplification. What you mean "exaggerated"? Read the link, it's the actual demand made by actual regulators, and it's completely within the realm of what is routinely done. I personally know many examples where people coming in US with many years of experience in certain professions, and able to find many job offers, are unable to actually work because they require licenses, which require expensive education, teaching these people what they already know and in many cases can do much better than the license teachers. It is a rule, at least in the US. Maybe in UK it is not, congratulations if so.