4 ms·
I agree with you, depending on the implementation. Many people replying seem to think you are advocating the execution of every man and woman who work for the
by appleflaxen 10y ago
I agree with you, depending on the implementation.
Many people replying seem to think you are advocating the execution of every man and woman who work for the company. I suspect that's not what you mean.
But how do you execute the entity economically?
To me, the right way to do it would be for the US government to take ownership of all the stock, and for the stock to be resold under a new corporate name. A criminal trial should then take place, with the C-suite officers and board of directors under scrutiny regarding their roles in the decisions, with clemency/immunity given to engineers and laborers for their full and complete testimony.
The only way the behavior changes is if you sanction it with meaningful consequences.
- SwellJoe 10y agoAll that sounds pretty good, to me. My words were probably poorly chosen; and it was a casual comment, intended to be taken casually, not as a call for a bloody revolution. I thought my disclaimer of being opposed to the actual death penalty for humans was sufficient to alleviate any fear that I actually ever want anyone killed, but the angry response seems to indicate otherwise.